See how structured feedback works
This example shows one assignment, one student, and one full revision cycle—from submission to approval.
Assignments are shared via a single link. Students open it, enter their details, and submit their work—no accounts required. Everything below shows what happens next.
Student submits work
Critical Analysis Essay
1200–1500 words • MLA format • Include thesis, evidence, and counterargument
Submitted: March 9, 2026 18:23 UTC (On time)
Student comment: "This is my first draft. I focused on the thesis and evidence sections."
Files:
- essay_draft_v1.pdf
- works_cited.pdf
Instructor reviews draft feedback
The instructor can write feedback from scratch or let AI prepare a private draft first. Students only see published feedback.
Status: Draft
AI-prepared draft summary: The submission shows a solid start, but several areas need revision before approval.
The instructor reviews, edits, and approves everything before publishing.
Feedback is structured and prioritized, so the next steps are clear before anything is published.
The thesis is too broad. Focus on one defensible claim.
MLA citations are inconsistent. Use one format throughout.
Use a consistent structure: claim → evidence → analysis.
Where do you plan to address the counterargument?
Feedback is published
Once published, the student sees the instructor's approved summary and the feedback items that need attention.
Outcome: Needs fixes
Published summary: Good foundation, but the thesis, evidence, and citations need revision before approval.
Narrow the thesis to one clear, defensible argument.
Fix MLA citation format throughout the document.
Use a more consistent paragraph structure: claim → evidence → analysis.
Where do you plan to address the counterargument?
Student revises and replies in context
Submitted: March 11, 2026 14:12 UTC (Late, allowed)
Student comment: "I revised the thesis, improved the paragraph structure, fixed the citations, and moved the counterargument after the main argument."
Files:
- essay_final_v2.pdf
- works_cited_updated.pdf
Where do you plan to address the counterargument?
Student: I moved it after the main argument, before the conclusion.
Work is approved
Outcome: Approved
Published summary: The thesis is now clear, evidence is better structured, citations are consistent, and the counterargument is placed effectively.
Thesis narrowed to one clear argument.
MLA citation formatting corrected throughout the paper.
Paragraph structure is now more consistent across the essay.
Counterargument placement discussed and resolved in context.
Student: I moved it after the main argument, before the conclusion.
Instructor: That works well. It strengthens the flow of the argument before the conclusion.
This is one review cycle—from submission to approval—with structured feedback, revision history, and student replies kept in one place.
Try this with your own assignment